Bowman Football, 1948–1955

1948 Bowman: the postwar starting point

The 108-card issue uses small black-and-white photographs. It is a separate checklist from 1948 Leaf, not a monochrome edition of that set. Sammy Baugh and Sid Luckman are useful starting points for understanding the issue. Check both borders and the photograph for creases that disappear in a distant slab image.

1950 Bowman: color after a gap

Bowman returned to football after skipping 1949. The 144 cards remain small, at about 2-1/16 by 2-1/2 inches. Painted player images give the issue a different character from 1948. A listing described simply as a “1950s Bowman” leaves too much unresolved for a serious comparison.

1951 Bowman: a taller format

The 144-card 1951 issue increases the height to about 3-1/8 inches and puts the player’s name in a front label. The similar painted style should not cause confusion with 1950. Measure a raw card only with a safe, nonabrasive method; do not force it into a holder intended for a smaller issue.

1952 Bowman Large and 1952 Bowman Small

These are distinct size formats of the same 144-subject issue, not two grading descriptions. Large cards are approximately 2-1/2 by 3-3/4 inches; Small cards are approximately 2-1/16 by 3-1/8. Frank Gifford and the final-card Jim Lansford are notable collecting targets. Store format as a separate checklist field so a Small card never accidentally fills a Large slot.

1953 Bowman and 1954 Bowman

The 1953 set has 96 cards and a football-shaped area containing the player and team names. The 1954 set expands the checklist; compare the actual year’s reverse and design rather than assuming all large Bowman cards belong to 1952. For a run collection, one representative card from each year can show design changes before you commit to complete sets.

1955 Bowman: the final original Bowman season

The 160-card finale retains the larger 2-1/2 by 3-3/4-inch format. It belongs beside, rather than inside, the separate 1955 Topps All-American college-history issue. Inspect centering and the colored design independently of corner sharpness. An appealing lower-grade portrait can be a better fit for a display collection than a higher number with distracting print defects.

Continue exploring